
With 
The Sixth Sense, M. Night caught everyone by surprise and delivered one hell of a late summer hat trick.  He topped himself with 
Unbreakable, which remains on of my favorite movies of all time.  I found myself defending 
Signs more often than I'd care to admit against detractors who seemingly hated it.  M. Night lost me a bit with 
The Village, but I still found that to be an interesting misfire.  
Lady in the Water is just a misfire.  M. Night's strongest suit used to be his storytelling, but you wouldn't know that from 
Lady.  This is jumbled, lazy, "first draft" screenwriting that reeks of self-importance and self-congratulation.  It's a dumb story filled with dumb characters (Paul Giamatti's performance, aside) and it has no reason being a movie that people pay money to go see.  If I must say something good about 
Lady, I thought James Newton Howard's score was lush and beautiful and really elevated the movie at times.  Although I admire anything original coming out of Hollywood, if this is what we're going to get, I say: bring on 
The Pink Panther 2!
    
     
    
  
  
3 Comments:
"Lady in the Water"...more like "Dead in the Water"...or "Turd in the Toilet" I apologize for being crass, but a juvenile movie deserves a juvenile comment.
I was, however, rooting for Paul Giamati (I like him a lot). How could this film have been made? Were they making it up as they went along? Too much faith in Shayamalan?
The above comment is Erik's.
I like Giamatti too. I thought he was really good in it. But the storytelling was just lazy. Exposition after exposition with no real payoff. Rule number 1 in screenwriting: show don't tell. You don't have some half-comedic Korean character tell the audience everything about the plot.
Post a Comment
<< Home